Posts Tagged ‘offense’

The Montreal Canadiens defeated the Pittsburgh Penguins of the NHL recently. The Canadiens won because they shut down the Penguins’ star player and team captain Sydney Crosby. Canadiens forward Tomas Plekanec was assigned the task of shadowing Crosby so he couldn’t be effective and he was largely successful in that mission. After the game, Plekanec said you know you’ve got Crosby out of his game when he starts running all over the place and getting angry. I couldn’t have thought of a better way to express what happens when a company loses the initiative and is playing “out of its game.”

I have been spending a lot of time this year emphasizing the importance of being on the offensive. When you’re on the offensive, you have the initiative. That means you can choose the time, place and nature of your actions. You have freedom of manoeuvre to bring your strengths to bear against your competitors’ or opponents’ weaknesses. If you’ve lost the initiative, you are constantly reacting and having to fight on terrain and at a time not of your choosing.

So, offence is essential, but we also all need to find ways to leverage a temporary defensive posture so we can regain the initiative. The key is to know how to do so. Here are some techniques to bounce back from the defensive and get back to attacking, not by throwing yourself everywhere on the ice, but rather by focusing your actions and manoeuvres to be as effective and efficient as possible with your limited resources. When you’re on the defensive unwillingly, you need to use all your ammunition and forces wisely to get the attacker off balance and reacting to your manoeuvres. You have to setting the pace and leveraging your strengths against your competitors’ weaknesses.

1.    Be honest about your situation with yourself, your employees, and your allies.
2.    Take the time to prepare your defences by selecting strong positions beforehand or reinforcing your existing strong positions.
3.    Withdraw from weak positions where you can’t possible win, or win without a major investment of time and resources.
4.    Put time on your side by getting early to potentially strong future positions. In practice this means that you have to experiment with new products or markets that could become worthwhile in the medium to long term.
5.    Reassign the resources you can free up from weak activities to high potential activities.
6.    Maintain morale by adopting an offensive mindset and by deliberately choosing where and when you will go on the offensive.
7.    Develop detailed intelligence about markets, competitors, buyers, suppliers, etc.
8.    Maintain strict secrecy about your activities. Don’t announce what you will be doing unless you absolutely believe it will confer some kind of competitive advantage in your strategy.
9.    Accept small defeats and failures so you can learn from them and transfer the lessons learned to future endeavours.
10.    Concede your opponents’ or competitors’ or customers’ obstacles or strengths, while bringing the competition or battle back onto your turf.
11.    Create alliances of other smaller or weaker competitors so you can be stronger together.
12.    Claim a defeat is a win, or that weakness is actually strength.

These are the approaches that have been taken in the past to turnaround business failures into spectacular successes. When Steve Jobs returned to the helm of Apple in 1997, he spent six months evaluating the company’s products. After the initial overview he told the Apple brass that the company was struggling and closing in on bankruptcy for the simple reason that they had lost their “mojo.” In the crude terms he was known for, he told them “our products are crap.” He turned it around by ruthlessly killing over 20 products and focusing just four products: a high-end Mac, a regular Mac, a high-end laptop, and a regular laptop. That was it. Apple has been so widely successful in the last decade and half, having introduced the iPod, the iMac, the iPhone, iPad, iTunes, etc., that it’s easy to forget that the company went back on the offensive only after a defensive retrenchment and savvy manoeuvring to regain the initiative.

A few years before, Lou Gerstner was brought in by the IBM board to replace Akers and turn that company around. Akers had been preparing to break up the company and sell it piecemeal. He thought that Big Blue couldn’t be turned around and that there was no real synergy in its various businesses. Gerstner had been very successful as CEO of American Express and Nabisco. He immediately cancelled the planned divestments and worked to rebuild the company’s brand and launched its return to growth. Gerstner recognized that IBM’s future couldn’t be built on past glory. He saw the explosion of the Internet so he retooled the company to take advantage of the new reality. However, his experience running two of America’s largest consumer oriented companies, with all their complexities, led him to conclude that there was a need for large-scale IT integrators to help these companies with their information and knowledge management processes. That was his biggest move and it underlay IBM’s return to growth and dominance.

These two examples are probably two of the biggest corporate turnarounds in recent history. They both started with excruciatingly honest appraisals of the companies’ respective situations and a willingness to launch a desperate fight to regain the initiative. As we approach the end of 2013, it’s a good time to examine where you and your organizations are on the defensive through your competitors’ actions. The question is, are you willing to recognize these failings and to fight to regain the initiative?

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© Alcera Consulting Inc. 2013. We encourage the sharing of this information and forwarding of this email with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Infiltration is one of the most effective military manoeuvres for getting into the enemy’s defences by sneaking in small parties to raid and built up forces for a surprise strike. On the business side, Apple penetrated the institutional and corporate markets against Windows and RIM by gradually winning over users to the iPhone and iPad. Apple never directly took aim at these markets, but let their customers do it for them by demanding to be able to use their devices within corporations and other institutional organizations. Another example: Porter Airlines gained a loyal corporate following by offering business class service with frequent flights between Montreal and Toronto’s downtown airport. This infiltrated Air Canada’s most lucrative segment and allowed Porter to build a larger offering over a few short years.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Apple just launched it’s iPhone 5S and 5C. If ever we needed an example of how moral — i.e., psychological — factors can outweigh physical, material factors in business, then this is it. I am a big fan of Apple products. I have an iPhone, Macbook Pro, and iPad. However, even as a fan I have to admit that I was surprised by the effect that the iPhone 5S has had, with long lineups to get one. The high-end models appear to be outselling the low-end models by a large margin. This just goes to show that psychologically, Apple and its products are miles ahead of competing products. Even though the latter are roughly speaking equivalent in functionality and appearance, consumers still have an emotional attachment to Apple’s products. The media speculation ahead of the launch of the two new iPhones and the public enthusiasm for them demonstrate conclusively that curiosity and emotion drive people to commit to a company’s products and services beyond just the technical and functional characteristics. As with military strategy and tactics, psychological factors are a huge force multiplier.

Food for Thought
Have you created an emotional attachment with your customers, employees, suppliers, distributors, and managers?

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Here is an extract from my first teleconference in my 2013-14 Teleconference Series on How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. You get more info here and register for all ten teleconferences. The cost is only $150.00 for all ten. That will amount to 9-10 hours of audio. I provide a MP3 download within 48 hours of the call so you can listen as many times as you want at your leisure.

Listen to a sample extract:

The full teleconference last approximately 55 minutes and is available for purchase at $20.00 Cdn. Just contact me at info@alcera.ca.

It’s not too late to register for all 10 teleconferences. The teleconferences will start at noon eastern on the 3rd Friday of the next ten months, and run until June 2014. Each of the calls covers a different aspect of how to apply military wisdom to win your business battles, and is based on a chapter in my book, Brilliant Manoeuvres : How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. I’m adding new material and content so these aren’t just a repeat of the book.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes permitted with full and proper attribution.

The great 19th century military theorist Clausewitz wrote that — I’m paraphrasing here — the first and most important task of a leader is to understand the type of conflict or struggle he is engaged in. Poker players apparently have a more mundane way of putting things. If you’re the only one at the table who’s wondering who the patsy is, then you’re it.

In the last week we’ve seen just how amateurish the Obama administration is when it comes to the Great Game of great power relations, war, and diplomacy. The Keystone Cops routine that is the Obama policy on Syria’s use of chemical weapons would be funny were the consequences and implications not so deadly and ominous. President Putin of Russia is not so dilettantish in his approach to Syria. He sees the civil war there as a struggle to maintain and reinforce his influence with thugish regimes all around the world. It is also a confirmation within Russia, if any was needed, of his status as a classic strongman. The situation is even starker for Assad, for whom this war is not just a political struggle, but a fight to the death. Given what has happened to other dictators after their downfall throughout the world (Mubarak, Khaddafi, Saddam), it’s not surprising that he sees things in this light. The US is playing with its credibility and standing on the world stage and its ability to influence the policies and alignments of other nations. Obama is also gambling with the prerogatives of the office of president as commander-in-chief. All because he apparently doesn’t have the stomach for the fight — which came with the job — or because he doesn’t realize how significant the current crisis is.

We can see this all the time in organizations and business. A market leading company sees a new product as a minor irritant or insignificant (as one of RIM’s co-CEOs Mike Laziridis said on seeing the first iPhone) whereas the attacker sees it as a matter of life and death. An executive is playing nice, but there are other people in the company who are gunning for his position.

Food for Thought
Are you in a fight? Do you know its nature? Do you competitors or opponents view it in the same light? Are you willing to pay the price to win or to “fall on your sword”?

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

REMINDER!

Richard’s monthly teleconference series on How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles starts on Friday 20 September 2013.

Get more information
Register Now!

The special registration price of only $100.00 for all 10 teleconferences runs out at midnight on Saturday 14 September. After that, the price goes up to $150.00. This includes a MP3 download within 48 hrs so you can listen at your leisure.

NOTE – Each of the teleconferences will also be available for download individually through my website after they are completed for $20.00 apiece.

Now is your chance to learn about and/or deepen your understanding of how military strategy, planning, tactics, and leadership can help you win and thrive in business.

Get more information
Register Now!

Each of the teleconferences is 45 to 60 minutes in duration and is based on a chapter in my book, Brilliant Manoeuvres.

Even if you already have the book, this is a great way to further your understanding. I will also be adding new content and intellectual property that I’ve developed since the publication of the book in October 2012 and that I use with my best and most aggressive clients!

As a special bonus, I will provide a complementary copy of Brilliant Manoeuvres, as well as a pdf copy of the Brilliant Manoeuvres Study Guide to assist you in assimilating the materials.

The teleconferences will start at 12 pm sharp on the third Friday of each month. An MP3 recording will be available for download within 48 hours of the call.

Schedule of calls with topics…

20 September 2013 — How Can Military Wisdom Apply to Business?

18 October 2013 — Offence-Seizing and Maintaining the Initiative

15 November 2013 — Defence-Securing Position and Regaining the Initiative

13 December 2013 — Selection and Maintenance of the Aim-The Principle of the Objective

17 January 2014 — You Can’t Be Everywhere at Once-Exploiting Limited Resources

21 February 2014 — No Plan Survives Contact with the Enemy-Planning, Friction, and the Fog of War

21 March 2014 — Is Military Intelligence Really an Oxymoron?

18 April 2014 — Bucks, Bullets and Bully Beef-Logistics and the Sinews of War

16 May 2014 — “The Moral is to the Physical as Three Is to One”-Morale, Cohesion and the Motivation to Perform

20 June 2014 — Follow Me! The Art of Leadership

Get more information
Register Now!

If you’ve already registered, your complementary copy of my book is in the mail and I will be sending the study guide before the first call. I will send instructions to join the calls next Monday.

For everyone else, what are you waiting for?

© 2013 Alcera Consulting Inc. All rights reserved.

As I write this article, President Obama is weighing the wisdom of launching some kind of attack by the United States against the Assad regime in Syria for its use of chemical weapons against part of the population.

I’m not going to join the chorus of those saying Obama should do this or do that. Rather, I wish to point out the inherent uncertainties, risks, and ambiguities involved in strategic decision-making at the international level when it involves conflict and the game of great power relations. Obama’s decisions in this conflict hold lessons for all of us, especially strategic leaders in business, government, public safety and others involved in weighing heavy risks and evaluating them against potential benefits of action…or inaction.

The first thing that strikes me is the overall ambiguity of the Syrian situation. It isn’t at all clear to me that there is a “good” side and a “bad” side. Sure, the Assad government is supported by Iran, Russia and, somewhat obliquely, China. Assad’s Alawite regime has also ruled the country for decades with an iron fist, but is the opposition any better? Moreover, the ramifications of any action by the US or other Western countries are likely to be mind-boggling in their complexity and scope. Can we really predict what will happen next, or what the outcomes of US actions are likely to be? The Middle East is a powder keg. Any decision to act has to be for the right reasons, and in this case, that would have to be reasons of state (raison d’état).

Speaking of which, what WOULD be the ostensible goal of a US-led intervention in the conflict? And why are chemical weapons any worse than others? Does the image of innocent children killed by sarin gas disgust us more than if we saw them mutilated by artillery shells or machine gun bullets? What is the REASON for the US and it’s allies to intervene? What are they expecting to achieve and to what end? As I wrote in Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles, selection and maintenance of the aim is the master principle of war and strategy. Is the US intervening just to assuage the collective conscience of part of the American public, or is there a greater raison d’état?

In setting strategic objectives and overall strategy, a leader must identify the ends, ways, and means of the particular military operation. He or she must also communicate these within the needs of security and confidentiality. The ends are the goals: What are we trying to achieve? The ways are the courses of action that are realistically at our disposal? As I learned in the army, there is always more than one way to achieve an aim, and they all have their inherent costs and benefits, risks and opportunities. Third, the ends and the ways determine the means that must be assigned to achieving the mission. There is an expression in French, which, loosely translated, means “We must give ourselves the means of our ambitions.” In other words, are we willing to pay the price to achieve our objectives, and is this price in line with our overall interests and purposes?

There is much public (and media) outcry about the situation in Syria. But what would the US be actually achieving by a military intervention? What is the purpose and what higher aims does it serve in the national interest? I know this may sound crass for all those people in Syria who have lost their lives in this civil war, but there are other civil wars around the globe, although not necessarily in such dangerous geopolitical regions. And why did the West, led by the US, aid the Libyan rebels, who turned out to be not exactly saintly themselves, while the West has hesitated to aid the rebels in Syria? There are many reasons, such as the refugee crisis in Italy that was caused by the civil war in Libya, as well as the fact that Syria is directly next to highly strategic countries, such as Turkey, Iraq, Israel, and Lebanon, plus the seemingly unwavering support of Iran and Russia.

All this goes to show that international relations and geopolitics require a decision calculus that varies from one situation to another. No two conflicts are ever alike, even moderately so. And as Sun Tzu said over 2,000 years ago, “War is the greatest affair of state, it must be thoroughly pondered.”

The last element that I find of interest is how Obama is must now perhaps eat his words from last year, when he said that if Assad used chemical weapons then the US would intervene. In leadership involving any kind of conflict or showdown, threats can’t be bandied about idly. If you utter a threat or a warning, you have to be ready to act on it otherwise you will be perceived, correctly in my estimation, as a lame duck.

Leadership isn’t easy, as we can see with the Syrian crisis. Selecting the best aim and developing a strategy and plan to achieve it are the most critical tasks of any strategic leader. Only time will tell if Obama is correct in his actions, whether he decides to intervene or not on behalf of the international community. Paraphrasing Sun Tzu, we can say that we need to thoroughly ponder strategic leadership. It holds lessons for all us, not just those making decisions over conflict and war.

© Alcera Consulting Inc. 2013. We encourage the sharing of this information and forwarding of this email with attribution. All other rights reserved.

In Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles, I wrote, “You can’t be a leader if you’re afraid to seek and accept responsibility. By definition, a leader is in front, which implies a willingess to accept responsibility and be accountable for his or her decisions and actions, as well as those of the people he or she is leading.”

As Obama is currently wondering what actions to take about Syria, I feel we are facing one of the great failings of leadership in the last decade. One of the things I learned in commanding troops on peacekeeping duty is that you have to say what you mean, and mean what you say. Consistently. Words have to be carefully weighed, but threats and promises must be kept. By flip-flopping so many times on the issue of retaliation for Assad’s use of chemical weapons in the Syrian civil war, Obama has shown himself incapable of accepting the difficult responsibilities of the office of commander-in-chief of the US armed forces. I’m not saying he should attack or not attack, but he seems completely incapable of accepting the responsibility that goes with the decision. Either way, own up to your ethical responsibilities as leader; say what you mean, and mean what you say.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

One of the most effective infantry tactics is infiltration. For instance, during the First World War, the Germans and the Western allies learned the importance of sending in small groups of fighters to scout out enemy positions ahead of a battle, or simply to conduct short, sharp raids. Infiltration could be deadly in both material and psychological terms, as it caused a steady drip drip of casualties while also undermining the morale of those being infiltrated. This continued throughout the Second World War, Korea, Vietnam, and Afghanistan.

Companies often fail to appreciate the indidious undermining of their once-solid positions by a steady stream of competitors and their slightly “improved” or differentiated products. Competition usually comes as infiltration, slowly but inexorably working its way into the market. One day, the leadership of a once-dominant company wakes up to find itself surrounded by competitive offerings and it all happened so slowly that they can’t pinpoint the specific time it happened. But they are nonetheless surrounded and in danger. This is what has happened to Blackberry, Microsoft, and others.

Food for Thought
Are you susceptible to infiltration by competitors and non-business stakeholders who can undermine your strong positions? Can you use infiltration against your competitors?

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Brilliant Manoeuvre

Sometimes you need to withdraw in order to come back stronger and fight another day.

Discussion
One of the things I learned in the military and from my study of history is that you sometimes have to withdraw from a position of weakness where you can’t win in order to come back stronger with a better chance of dominating the field of battle. The Roman legions were expert at doing this, as were the British during the building of their empire in the 18th and 19th centuries. In business we sometimes insist on throwing good money after bad in a losing situation. It’s okay to be persistent, but when you’ve been trying for years to, say, break into a market without much success and it’s burning up huge amounts of capital, it may be time to withdraw in order to fight another day on another battlefield, with different weapons and from a position of strength.

Food for Thought

  • Have you been failing repeatedly with a new product or market despite sustained effort and huge investment in resources? What would be the effect of withdrawing from this approach?
  • Are you maintaining products or staying in markets because of pigheadedness, or because you can truly win with them?
  • Do you have raging successes that you have ignored because they didn’t fit your ideas of the business or strategy? What about more obscure successes within your business?
  • What would it take to elevate these unexpected successes to replace the repeated failures? Can you transfer resources from the latter to the former?
  • Do you have a systematic approach to experimenting with new products, markets, processes, and business models? Are you open to change or do you stick to your approaches in the face of contrary evidence?

NEW!

Join me for my first ever monthly teleconference series on Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles . I will be introducing new content and techniques to complement those in the book. The series starts on Friday 20 September 2013 with a monthly call on the 3rd Friday of every month until June 2014. The cost is $100.00 if you register before 14 September 2013. There will be a MP3 download within 48 hours of each call so you can (re)listen at your own leisure.

Register now!

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.