Je ferai un « Briefing de préparation au combat » lors du Kickoff Motivation 2015, organisé annuellement par Michel Bélanger de La Zone Vente (lazonevente.com). Voir le billet descriptif de Michel…
Posts Tagged ‘entrepreneurship’
Êtes-vous prêts pour un automne chaud ?
Posted: August 6, 2015 in Readiness & StrategyTags: attack, brilliant maneuvers, entrepreneurship, executive development, Marketing and Business Development, Military Lessons, Personal Development, relevance of military strategy to business, Speaking Events, Strategy, team, Webinars and Training
Make small, probing advances with new or modified products, services, capabilities, and business models
Posted: July 13, 2015 in Readiness & StrategyTags: attack, brilliant maneuvers, business, entrepreneurship, executive development, experimentation, Exploiting Change, innovation, Innovation and Adaptation, Leadership, Marketing and Business Development, Military Lessons, offense, opportunity, relevance of military strategy to business
- You learn more by moving than by staying put. The normal impulse is to stay put and defend your position when you don’t know where to go or what to do. Unfortunately, this leaves you open to rapid change in the market as well as competitive threats. Moving gradually into a new market or a new product or service category gives you time to learn and adjust your approach without over-investing at the beginning. You also get to pull back if, as often happens, you’ve made a mistake or misjudged the situation.
- Advance on a wide (or wider) front. It’s best to send scouting parties to report back about the lay of the land and the enemy’s positions, then to follow up with more forces if you’re successful. In business, this can mean trying many, small experiments with new products or markets to see what will happen, and then preserving those that succeed.
- Don’t put all your eggs into one basket. If you can’t make accurate and timely predictions to know what will succeed in the long run then it stands to reason that you need to diversify investments and assets. This doesn’t mean becoming a conglomerate. It is preferable to experiment in a controlled manner at the edges of the business while using profits in existing business lines to fuel that exploratory work.
- Always cover your moves. When I was a young infantry officer, we were taught to cover our moves with a firebase that could provide support in case we came under enemy fire. It’s better to move gradually over time into a new market or with a new strategy by small steps. This can be done remarkably quickly if you keep up the pressure by making incremental changes in a deliberate and consistent manner.
- Reinforce success with backup forces. Once you have made it through the enemy’s front lines, apply resources to reinforce the initial breakthrough. The same notion applies to experimental business efforts. Success with one or some of them can be reinforced with new resources or with resources transferred from existing business lines. The result can be better positioning for the future.
- Maintain reserves to exploit success. All of these principles require some level of resources, first to experiment and then to reinforce success by investing in the winners. This requires the maintenance of cash reserves or access to capital either from an existing business line, by borrowing, or by attracting new investors.
I’m never too busy to discuss your needs or those of anyone else you feel may benefit from meeting or talking to me. So feel free to contact me at any time!
A New Approach to Strategy Formulation and Implementation
Posted: June 9, 2015 in Powerful IdeasTags: business, cohesion, entrepreneurship, executive development, Leadership, Management, Marketing and Business Development, Military Lessons, mission, morale, relevance of military strategy to business, Strategy
I was recently discussing different approaches to strategy formulation and implementation with my good friend Phil Symchych. Phil is an expert in wealth building for owners of mid-market enterprises. When I presented some of the military principles of strategy, Phil enthusiastically endorsed them and encouraged me to create an approach around the four most important ones.
As a result, I’ve just developed a quick and easy model for applying military principles of strategy and tactics to achieve business success. I’m calling this new model, MOME. It stands for Morale, Objectives, Mass, and Economy. Naturally, I’ve leveraged these principles with my near decade-long experience of applying this philosophy to help businesses grow and prosper in the face fierce competition and rapidly changing wants and needs. Let’s look at each in turn and then at some of the ready applications for the model.
Morale. Military strategists and leaders have long known that MORALE is THE critical human factor in war and conflict. However, it is also foundational for business and strategy. The simplest definition of morale is the “will to victory.” It is the willingness to make sacrifices, persevere, and focus on achieving one’s aims despite setbacks, obstacles, and opposition. Morale is driven by the quality of leadership, the mission, and vision of the organization, and the level of engagement of employees and members to its foundational principles and goals.
Objectives. All military strategists agree that selection and maintenance of the aim is THE most important of all the principles of war and conflict. You need a clearly articulated end state—what does victory or success look like—as well as a specific and concrete mission to get everyone aligned and working to the same end. Moreover, when you communicate these throughout the organization, telling people what outcomes to achieve and not how to achieve them, they become motivated to use their initiative and leadership to overcome obstacles and adapt on the fly to the inevitable changes in situation and conditions. This is why a business needs a concrete vision of where it is heading as well as an engaging mission for customers and employees. The important thing is to be as concrete as possible and to operationalize the vision into a hierarchy of subordinated goals and missions to maximize alignment and focus at all levels of the organization.
Mass. In the British and Canadian military, this principle is known as concentration of force, mainly because they are small forces. But in the US forces and other large forces, they simply come right out and talk about MASS. The fundamental point here is that you must put your money where your mouth is. You have to concentrate for the “big push” or main effort so you attain your objectives as quickly and efficiently as possible. Businesses must be aware of their strengths and weaknesses and focus them to out-manoeuvre competitors in order to offer greater value for targeted customers.
Economy. This is the flip side of mass and concentration of force. There are never sufficient resources to accomplish everything that you want. You have to prioritize. In fact, the best definition of economy is the one developed by economists: Economy is the allocation of scarce resources that have alternative uses. You may have to take a defensive or maintenance posture in some areas of your business so you can free up the resources to invest in the business lines where you want to be on the offensive. By the same token, you have support your objectives and lines of advance with adequate logistical and financial means. There is also the “economic” and financial aspect of your strategy. Whatever you decide to do, it has to be “economical” in the sense of presenting a strong and valid business case.
To see how the MOME model applies in practice, let’s look at the example of an acquisition:
- How will this affect MORALE and other group factors in the acquiring company and the acquired? Does this change the combined units’ fundamental mission? Who will stay on and who will be let go?
- What are the OBJECTIVES of the acquisition or merger? Have these been clearly articulated and communicated to all stakeholders? What outcomes are you expecting? Are they realistic or more like wishful thinking?
- Will the acquisition allow you to generate more MASS for high-growth opportunities or are you just throwing good money after bad? Is this just an ego trip or is it a viable opportunity? What is the main effort of the acquisition process and what are the supporting actions? What is your plan to out-manoeuvre and surprise your competitors, and to apply your center of gravity—i.e., your key strengths—to achieve your objectives?
- What are the ECONOMICS of the plan? Where do you need to ECONOMIZE in order to free up lower priority resources so you can create mass on the main effort? How will you prioritize these resources and what are the supporting functions and tasks?
These are just some of the specific questions your plan and strategy must answer so you can create the conditions for success and victory. You can’t leave anything to chance, and where there are uncertainties, you have to guard your flanks and rear areas with sound risk management.
How do YOUR strategy and plans measure up to the MOME model? How is morale in your company? What are your objectives? Do you have mass? Are you economizing in the right areas, and what are the economics of your business? I can help you answer these questions.
I’m never too busy to discuss your needs or those of anyone else you feel may benefit from meeting or talking to me. So feel free to contact me at any time!
Richard Martin is The Force Multiplier. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.
© 2015 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.
Define your end state
Posted: June 8, 2015 in LeadershipTags: brilliant maneuvers, business, competition, competitors, entrepreneurship, executive development, Innovation and Adaptation, Leadership, mission, morale, never fight fair, Personal Development, planning, relevance of military strategy to business, Strategy, team
Goal-setting is a buzzword (or is that buzzterm?) that gets bandied about a lot. We’re supposed to set clear goals so everyone is motivated and knows what to aim for.
Forget SMART goals though: specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-bound. Sometimes the last thing we need is an “achievable” goal, much less a “realistic” one. Most accomplishments–and they needn’t be monumental or earth-shaking in scope–appear unrealistic and unachievable in at least some respects to some people some of the time. The other things are useful, but speed, surprise, and originality can be just as important, if not moreso, especially if you’re in highly competitive situation.
Instead, I propose defining the end state you’re looking to create. This comes from military practice, where a commander clearly communicates what the battlefield or operation will achieve in very concrete terms: for instance, the enemy has withdrawn from objective X and is on the run; our forces have seized objective X and are in a strong position to exploit to line Z 20 km beyond the objective.
This type of goal creates a vision that anyone can relate to. Moreover, it sets the parameters for what is needed to get there. “If this is what the end state looks like, then what do we have to do and by when, with what resources, and in what manner, for that to become the new reality?”
I’m never too busy to discuss your needs or those of anyone else you feel may benefit from meeting or talking to me. So feel free to contact me at any time!
Richard Martin is The Force Multiplier. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.
© 2015 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.
Regularly evaluate your offensive posture
Posted: June 2, 2015 in Readiness & StrategyTags: attack, brilliant maneuvers, business, entrepreneurship, Innovation and Adaptation, Marketing and Business Development, Military Lessons, offense, Strategy
I have developed a quick and easy tool to help you determine and evaluate your offensive posture. Ask yourself the following questions:
- Do you pick and choose the best customers or do you take what you can get?
- Do you set your price and deal with early adopters, or do you take the price the market sets and deal mostly with late adopters?
- Do you innovate new or modified products and services or do you imitate your competitors’ ones?
- Is your brand admired, a trendsetter; or do you just blend into the background?
- Are you constantly surprising competitors and customers–in a good way that is–or are you often the one with the deer in the headlights look?
If you can’t answer positively to at least 3 of these 5 questions, then you’re letting others take the lead and have lost the initiative. You’re a commodity, not a brand.
Contact me if you want the evaluation tool I’ve developed. We can also discuss how you can seize and maintain the initiative so YOU can be on the offensive. I’m never too busy to discuss your needs or those of anyone else you feel may benefit from meeting or talking to me. So feel free to contact me at any time!
Richard Martin is The Force Multiplier. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.
© 2015 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.
Send out scouting parties before your commit your main forces
Posted: May 4, 2015 in Readiness & StrategyTags: attack, brilliant maneuvers, business, competition, defense, entrepreneurship, Marketing and Business Development, Military Lessons, never fight fair, offense, opportunity, reconnaissance, relevance of military strategy to business, sales, selling
Time spend in reconnaissance is rarely wasted. Whenever a military force is advancing against enemy positions, it always sends out scouting parties to reconnoitre the terrain, confirm enemy positions and strength, and find gaps and weaknesses in the defences.
Selling should be conducted in the exact same manner. Time spent in preparation, is rarely wasted. Even if you think you know what you’re up against, you must sound out your clientele and send out metaphorical scouting parties to size up the client, identify potential objectives, wants, and needs, as well as identify and assess the competition. You can do this through a phone call, telemarketing (if you’re reaching out to find leads), online research, or background research from your company’s own data banks and CRM software.
The key point is, don’t go in blind, even if you think you know everything you need to know. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, and that’s not just good motherly (or doctorly) advice.
Richard Martin is The Force Multiplier. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.
I’m never too busy to discuss your needs or those of anyone else you feel may benefit from meeting or talking to me. So feel free to contact me at any time!
© 2015 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.
Target Should Have Started with a Bridgehead and Phased Expansion in Canada
Posted: January 19, 2015 in Readiness & StrategyTags: attack, brilliant maneuvers, business, competition, decision-making, entrepreneurship, experimentation, Exploiting Change, Innovation and Adaptation, Management, Marketing and Business Development, Military Lessons, offense, relevance of military strategy to business, Strategy
Last week Target announced that it was shutting down completely its Canadian operation, all 133 stores, and taking a $5.4 billion writedown. What was originally supposed to be the beginning of a glorious international expansion has turned into a lesson in humility and hubris. There was a lot of talk of how they had poor merchandising, high prices, lack of stock, etc etc. This is all true, but the main cause of this was arrogance. They appeared to think they could launch across Canada en masse without learning about the market(s), building a solid supplier network and logistics, and experimenting to adapt to the Canadian marketplace and competitive dynamic.
A military force that’s fixing to cross a major obstacle into new territory always starts with a bridgehead. The aim is to secure a foothold that can be defended and to build up strength and supplies of fuel and ammunition. Only when you’ve done so successfully do you extend the beachhead by probing and seeking gaps in the enemy defenses. You can then attempt a breakout. We can’t be sure Target would have been ultimately successful, but if they had started with a few stores in various parts of the country, experimented, generated experience and lessons learned, and only then tried to expand in phases, they would probably have done a lot better and would still be expanding instead of retreating humbly back to their home base in the US.
I’m never too busy to discuss your needs or those of anyone else you feel may benefit from meeting or talking to me. So feel free to contact me at any time!
Richard Martin is a Master Strategist and Leadership Catalyst. Richard brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.
© 2015 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.
Competition Is the Motor of Innovation
Posted: January 6, 2015 in Powerful IdeasTags: business, competition, entrepreneurship, Exploiting Change, innovation, Innovation and Adaptation, Strategy
Innovation and competition are always at the forefront of my discussions with my prospects and clients, specifically, how to make them work together so a company or organization can thrive.
I used to think the motor of innovation was trial and error experimentation, but my thinking has been evolving. Experimentation is how innovation takes place, but it is competition that is in the driver’s seat. In other words, the motivation to invent and tinker is what is driving people to innovate, not the mechanism of experimentation.
I enjoy history; so a few historical examples will illustrate my point. The Italian Renaissance was based on the discovery and spread of the ideas and writings of Classical Antiquity. But what drove people to look for, translate, and disseminate ancient works by philosophers, scientists, architects, and playwrights? It was competition between Italian city-states, and their sponsorship of thinkers, researchers, creators, and innovators. The Florentine Medici’s were probably the most active in this regard. It was their arrogance, egotism, and power-hunger which drove them to encourage and provide commissions artists and humanist intellectuals in their midst. It’s that flowering of rivalry and civic pride that drove the flowering of arts and philosophy that created Leonardo and Michelangelo. As an aside, the latter were always in competition with each other for commissions and repute.
The humanist ideals and thinking of the Renaissance couldn’t have spread to Northern Europe though without the impulse of the Protestant Reformation. It was anger at the abuses of the Catholic Church that led Martin Luther to lead the initial religious reforms. But it probably wouldn’t have happened without the political and economic fragmentation that reigned in the German Holy Roman Empire. Local potentates were eager to break free of papal and imperial authority, and this generated religious competition and political competition. This in turn created a market for ideas and writings.
By the late 16th and most of the 17th centuries, the Calvinist Dutch provinces became a magnet for thinkers who wished to work and publish with minimal hindrance from political and ecclesiastic authorities, Protestant or Catholic. It is no accident that the originators of modern science and thought, luminaries such as Descartes, Gassendi, Galileo, Hobbes, and Locke, either chose to settle in Holland or to publish their works there. Yes, there were incessant wars, revolts, and other forms of social struggle throughout Europe. Millions of people died for the sake of ideas about freedom, justice, or just plain hubris. But it was this state of confusion and intense rivalry that fuelled the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Scientific Revolution.
Other examples of innovation and creativity driven by competition and hubris abound. For instance, Darwin came up with the essentials of his theory of natural selection and natural evolution about 20 years before he decided to publish it. It was when he learned that Alfred Russell Wallace was about to scoop him that he rushed The Origin of Species to the publisher. Darwin was constitutionally anxious about upsetting established ideas and making enemies. It was the threat of someone else getting all the credit that outweighed his fear and anxiety about rocking the boat. And rock it he did.
I bring up these examples because we sometimes feel compelled to be “team players” and avoid rocking the boat. We don’t want to upset the perception of good feelings within an organization or company. However, as we see from history, it is ego-motivated competitiveness that drives innovation. Creators, tinkerers, inventors, and artists of all kinds want to be recognized and get the credit and glory that go with their products and ideas.
Free market economies with minimal regulation and interference are conducive to growth, creativity, innovation and development. The previous government of the Province of Quebec had created a program to choose economic “gazelles” for state support. Thankfully, the current Liberal government canned that idea as soon as it assumed power and the project was stillborn. How can you choose which companies and which ideas will work on the economic front? You can’t. It is free choice and competition that does this. If some companies fail at the attempt, that’s the price of innovation and economic development. Protection only works for the seemingly well-ensconced privileged few, and even then over the short term. That doesn’t just include “capitalists,” but also protected guilds, trades, and various commercial oligopolies.
The Uber threat has done more for competition and innovation in the taxi industry in one year than happened in the last three decades! Taxi companies that were sitting in the warm sun like fat cats have decided to launch competing applications, open up to some competition, maybe even including quicker service, cleaner cabs, nicer drivers, and demand-driven fees. Who knows what can happen next?
I have my money on hover cabs like they showed in the movie The Fifth Element.
I’m never too busy to discuss your needs or those of anyone else you feel may benefit from meeting or talking to me. So feel free to contact me at any time!
Richard Martin is a Master Strategist and Leadership Catalyst. Richard brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.
© 2015 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.
Seize and maintain the initiative–this is the essence of offensive action
Posted: January 5, 2015 in Readiness & StrategyTags: attack, brilliant maneuvers, business, competition, competitors, entrepreneurship, Exploiting Change, innovation, Leadership, Marketing and Business Development, Military Lessons, mission, relevance of military strategy to business, Strategy
- Do you find yourself continually responding to competitors’ actions or do you instead initiate changes that your competitors must respond to?
- Do your competitors find you predictable? Is there something you could start doing that would be out of character, but that would put them on the defensive and give you back the initiative?
- How do you define your mission and business? Is it a narrow view-providing a particular category of product or service-or is it a wider view-searching for ways of fulfilling customer needs at a more general or abstract level? Could you widen the scope of your business by redefining your business and mission?
- Is it likely that you will still be serving exactly the same customers in the same way in one year, two years, five years, or even ten years? What would have to happen for this situation to remain the same at those time intervals? This will give you an indication of how realistic your forecasts are.
- Are your decisions today likely to hem you in in the short, medium, or long terms? What can you do to innovate while maintaining your freedom of action in the longer term?
- How fast can you move to implement new strategies and tactics?
I’m never too busy to discuss your needs or those of anyone else you feel may benefit from meeting or talking to me. So feel free to contact me at any time!
Richard Martin is a Master Strategist and Leadership Catalyst. Richard brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.
© 2015 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.
New Offering from Richard Martin — The “Battle Procedure Briefing”
Posted: December 3, 2014 in Readiness & StrategyTags: attack, brilliant maneuvers, business, coaching, cohesion, competition, crisis leadership, decision-making, defense, entrepreneurship, executive development, Exploiting Change, Leadership, Management, Marketing and Business Development, Military Lessons, never fight fair, offense, opportunity, relevance of military strategy to business, resilience, risk, Speaking Events, Strategy, team, training, Webinars and Training
Now is the time to get ready for battle!
And you don’t have to go in blind. Why don’t you call on the best strategist to give you the edge you need?
Richard Martin served as an infantry officer for 21 years in the Canadian Army.
He is the expert in applying military wisdom and know-how to winning business and organizational battles.
Richard shows you how to apply the fundamental principles of military strategy and leadership: manoeuvre and discipline.
Richard will lead a real, honest to goodness BATTLE PROCEDURE BRIEFING for you and your team that will propel you to victory!
“Did you know that an infantry battalion only needs about 3 to 4 hours of prep and planning time to be battle ready? What are you waiting for to get the same benefits for your outfit?” – Richard Martin
Duration: 3 to 4 hours, at your location
Investment: variable depending on needs and objectives of client
Contact me right away to see if you have what it takes!
Richard Martin, The Leadership and Strategy Catalyst, Alcera Consulting Inc.
514 453-3993
Richard.Martin@alcera.ca
Check out Richard on video: http://www.alcera.ca/en/videos-teleconferences.php
Richard Martin is the author of Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles
“Brilliant Manoeuvres is Sun Tzu’s Art of War combined with Drucker’s The Effective Executive.”
— Alan Weiss, PhD, Author of the bestselling Million Dollar Consulting
The agenda and content may vary according to the client’s objectives, Richard’s professional opinion and experience, or the exact nature of the situation under assessment. While the procedure is important, it is also critical that strategic and tactical conditions guide the process. Richard has the expertise and discipline to keep the team on track with a systematic approach.
Note: Battle-dress not required… 😉