Posts Tagged ‘attack’

  • Do you occupy segments that represent large streams of highly profitable revenue for your business? If you’re not occupying these segments, why not? Are others likely to be interested in one or more of these segments? Are you at least trying to battle for vital, strategic ground?
  • What is your position relative to your strategic product market segments? Are you on key terrain or is it likely to be occupied by a competitor?
  • Can a competitor threaten your existing position? Could they wrest it away from you in some way? Is there an alternative position in the particular strategic segment under consideration that would allow a competitor to dominate?
  • Can you prevent or delay competitors from occupying alternative positions that threaten your vital ground?

Richard Martin is a Master Strategist and Leadership Catalyst. Richard brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.

© 2014 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

The three basic tactics are: go head to head (aka frontal attack); flanking manoeuvre; and bypass manoeuvre. However, here are some advanced tactics you can use that are more subtle and can amplify the effectiveness of the basic tactics. You can use these in any combination.

  • Infiltration: Think of the Trojan Horse, or water seeping into a building’s foundations.
  • Encroachment: Every day you move imperceptably closer to your opponent’s position.
  • Reversal: Use your opponent’s strength to overcome them.
  • Undermining: Dig a tunnel under your opponent’s walls and then blow up a mine.
  • Diversion: Get your opponent focused somewhere else so you can strike at his weak spot.
  • Deception: Pretend to do one thing when you’re really intending to do another.
  • Attrition: Wear your opponent down through constant, hit-and-run tactics.
  • Psychological warfare: Wear down your opponent’s resolve and undermine his morale.
  • Divide and conquer: Split your opponent’s forces and defeat them piecemeal.

Richard Martin is a Master Strategist and Leadership Catalyst. Richard brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to radically improve performance, grow, and thrive in the face of rapid change, harsh competition, and increasing uncertainty.

© 2014 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Too often I find myself trying to take on an obstacle or resistance head on. I could be trying to convince one of my daughters that she should follow my (brilliant) advice. Or I could be in a meeting with a prospect or client. I also know that this is one of the most common occurrences in business and management. Here are some tips to help you manoeuvre around that obstacle.

  1. Is the obstacle real or only a figment of your imagination? I’ve often imagined some future resistance that turned out to be just that, my imagination.
  2. Can you avoid a frontal assault? Say you’re trying to convince someone that they should do something. Why not do so gradually by presenting examples and evidence of its advantages rather than a full on attack?
  3. Do you find yourself trying to argue a point rationally all the time? Instead provide an emotional hook to show the psychological benefits of following your proposed course of action.
  4. Avoid confronting or criticizing people in front of others. People don’t like to lose face, so it’s always better to argue a point or engage in criticism in private.
  5. “Soften” up your target by providing positive feedback and encouragement before bringing up criticism.
  6. Is the obstacle or resistance even worth the fight? A basic military tactic is called “picket and bypass.” This means you go around minor centres of resistance while keeping watch on them to ensure they don’t catch you off guard as you go past them.
  7. Remember the most important principle of military strategy: selection and maintenance of the aim. Keep your ultimate objective and priorities in mind as you implement your plans.
  8. Resistance often crumbles in the face of overwhelming force. If you need to eliminate an obstacle to your success, use maximum resources at your disposal to neutralize it.
  9. No plan survives contact with the enemy (reality). Adjust your plans and implementation of them as you advance toward your goals.
  10. Accept that there will always be naysayers and competitors. Accept also that you can’t predict everything ahead of time. Keep resources in reserve to overcome and adjust to unforeseen circumstances.

Richard Martin is the Master Strategist and Leadership Catalyst. As an expert on strategy and leadership, Richard brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2014 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Shaping the battle space means that you don’t just accept the situation as it is, but also try to influence and mould it so that you can exploit your strengths and put your competitors in a weaker position. In business, we need to apply the same principles in order to “shape the competitive space.”

In military strategy and tactics, shaping involves using ground, obstacles, and the opponent’s strengths, weaknesses, and intentions against him. The objective is to get him to manoeuvre and move in such a way as to be surprised by your dispositions or in a weak position so that you can bring your strengths and combat power fully to bear.

The best example of that is an ambush. In an ambush, you position yourself on a route that you know the enemy will use and then when he passes there, you give him all you’ve got. The best defences are basically set up as ambushes. When I was an infantry company commander, my objective was to position my forces so that the attacker wouldn’t see me until I chose to open up with my weapons. By then though, my intention was that he would be positioned in such a way that I could use all of my weapons and forces to their most lethal effect, while the enemy couldn’t.

How can you shape the competitive battle space?

1.    Educate your customers about your products and services, or about what makes you different.
2.    Educate other stakeholders about why your services are important or different.
3.    Choose a time and place to act that your competitors or opponents can’t anticipate ahead of time.
4.    Position your products and services such that you’re bringing your strengths to bear in the most effective manner possible.
5.    Maintain secrecy about your activities in order to surprise everyone.
6.    Conversely, and if relevant, create anticipation about what you’ll be changing or doing differently.
7.    Withdraw from the field in some areas so you can concentrate on other areas that leverage your strengths better.
8.    Let your competitors in and then let them expend their resources, shooting their load on their first assault.
9.    Exploit a feature of your market that your competitors don’t know as well.

This is what companies like Walgreen did when Jean Coutu bought Rite Aid and Brooks Brothers pharmacies in the US. Walgreens knew that PJC didn’t have the resources to continue investing in their acquisitions once they had made their first assault. After that, Walgreens and the other established US based companies could just wear them down by aggressive pricing and other tactics, knowing that PJC didn’t have the capability to continue investing indefinitely.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2014 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Guerrilla strategy is very misunderstood, sometimes even by military historians and strategists. In the simplest terms, guerrilla strategy is a combination of small-scale offensive tactics with a defensive strategy at the highest levels. Despite what many people think, guerrilla warfare is a strategy of weakness. I think people focus on the small-scale offensive manoeuvres and fail to see the big picture. So, for instance, when the Taliban adopted a guerrilla strategy in Afghanistan after their downfall, it was because they realized that they couldn’t win by large-scale offensive strategy, nor could they win by small-scale defensive tactics. When you’re very weak, not only can you NOT go on the offensive, but you also can’t even hold ground effectively, or prevent the enemy from holding it. So what do you do? You revert to what are called hit and run tactics. These include raids, ambushes, and a lot of propaganda to brag about the results of your actions out of all proportion to their actual effectiveness.

So how does this get translated to business practice? Here are a few ways, but I invite you to think about the ways you can use guerrilla strategy if you are in a position of weakness against a very strong opponent.

  • Apply subtle offensive tactics: infiltration; encroachment; reversal; undermining; diversion; deception and disruption; attrition through hit-and-run; psychological warfare; divide & attack piecemeal
  • Poison the well: raise doubts about your opponent or competitor
  • Claim you’re on the defensive but actually take small offensive actions
  • Temporary alliances with small competitors or partners
  • Strategic alliances with larger competitors or partners

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2014 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

The Montreal Canadiens defeated the Pittsburgh Penguins of the NHL recently. The Canadiens won because they shut down the Penguins’ star player and team captain Sydney Crosby. Canadiens forward Tomas Plekanec was assigned the task of shadowing Crosby so he couldn’t be effective and he was largely successful in that mission. After the game, Plekanec said you know you’ve got Crosby out of his game when he starts running all over the place and getting angry. I couldn’t have thought of a better way to express what happens when a company loses the initiative and is playing “out of its game.”

I have been spending a lot of time this year emphasizing the importance of being on the offensive. When you’re on the offensive, you have the initiative. That means you can choose the time, place and nature of your actions. You have freedom of manoeuvre to bring your strengths to bear against your competitors’ or opponents’ weaknesses. If you’ve lost the initiative, you are constantly reacting and having to fight on terrain and at a time not of your choosing.

So, offence is essential, but we also all need to find ways to leverage a temporary defensive posture so we can regain the initiative. The key is to know how to do so. Here are some techniques to bounce back from the defensive and get back to attacking, not by throwing yourself everywhere on the ice, but rather by focusing your actions and manoeuvres to be as effective and efficient as possible with your limited resources. When you’re on the defensive unwillingly, you need to use all your ammunition and forces wisely to get the attacker off balance and reacting to your manoeuvres. You have to setting the pace and leveraging your strengths against your competitors’ weaknesses.

1.    Be honest about your situation with yourself, your employees, and your allies.
2.    Take the time to prepare your defences by selecting strong positions beforehand or reinforcing your existing strong positions.
3.    Withdraw from weak positions where you can’t possible win, or win without a major investment of time and resources.
4.    Put time on your side by getting early to potentially strong future positions. In practice this means that you have to experiment with new products or markets that could become worthwhile in the medium to long term.
5.    Reassign the resources you can free up from weak activities to high potential activities.
6.    Maintain morale by adopting an offensive mindset and by deliberately choosing where and when you will go on the offensive.
7.    Develop detailed intelligence about markets, competitors, buyers, suppliers, etc.
8.    Maintain strict secrecy about your activities. Don’t announce what you will be doing unless you absolutely believe it will confer some kind of competitive advantage in your strategy.
9.    Accept small defeats and failures so you can learn from them and transfer the lessons learned to future endeavours.
10.    Concede your opponents’ or competitors’ or customers’ obstacles or strengths, while bringing the competition or battle back onto your turf.
11.    Create alliances of other smaller or weaker competitors so you can be stronger together.
12.    Claim a defeat is a win, or that weakness is actually strength.

These are the approaches that have been taken in the past to turnaround business failures into spectacular successes. When Steve Jobs returned to the helm of Apple in 1997, he spent six months evaluating the company’s products. After the initial overview he told the Apple brass that the company was struggling and closing in on bankruptcy for the simple reason that they had lost their “mojo.” In the crude terms he was known for, he told them “our products are crap.” He turned it around by ruthlessly killing over 20 products and focusing just four products: a high-end Mac, a regular Mac, a high-end laptop, and a regular laptop. That was it. Apple has been so widely successful in the last decade and half, having introduced the iPod, the iMac, the iPhone, iPad, iTunes, etc., that it’s easy to forget that the company went back on the offensive only after a defensive retrenchment and savvy manoeuvring to regain the initiative.

A few years before, Lou Gerstner was brought in by the IBM board to replace Akers and turn that company around. Akers had been preparing to break up the company and sell it piecemeal. He thought that Big Blue couldn’t be turned around and that there was no real synergy in its various businesses. Gerstner had been very successful as CEO of American Express and Nabisco. He immediately cancelled the planned divestments and worked to rebuild the company’s brand and launched its return to growth. Gerstner recognized that IBM’s future couldn’t be built on past glory. He saw the explosion of the Internet so he retooled the company to take advantage of the new reality. However, his experience running two of America’s largest consumer oriented companies, with all their complexities, led him to conclude that there was a need for large-scale IT integrators to help these companies with their information and knowledge management processes. That was his biggest move and it underlay IBM’s return to growth and dominance.

These two examples are probably two of the biggest corporate turnarounds in recent history. They both started with excruciatingly honest appraisals of the companies’ respective situations and a willingness to launch a desperate fight to regain the initiative. As we approach the end of 2013, it’s a good time to examine where you and your organizations are on the defensive through your competitors’ actions. The question is, are you willing to recognize these failings and to fight to regain the initiative?

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© Alcera Consulting Inc. 2013. We encourage the sharing of this information and forwarding of this email with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Infiltration is one of the most effective military manoeuvres for getting into the enemy’s defences by sneaking in small parties to raid and built up forces for a surprise strike. On the business side, Apple penetrated the institutional and corporate markets against Windows and RIM by gradually winning over users to the iPhone and iPad. Apple never directly took aim at these markets, but let their customers do it for them by demanding to be able to use their devices within corporations and other institutional organizations. Another example: Porter Airlines gained a loyal corporate following by offering business class service with frequent flights between Montreal and Toronto’s downtown airport. This infiltrated Air Canada’s most lucrative segment and allowed Porter to build a larger offering over a few short years.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

There’s a fine balance to strike between trying new things, staying on top of evolving products, markets, and technology, while concentrating forces for the main effort. That main effort should always be based on the company’s core strength, the centre of gravity that gives it balance and stability. The company’s other activities should be developed to protect the centre of gravity so resources can be concentrated on the latter and also to explore the margins of the business, so that senior leaders can anticipate strategic changes, new technologies, and new entrants. If you dissipate your forces, there will be insufficient resources for the main push when its needed. This is what happened to Blackberry. The company’s leadership failed to assess and leverage its centre of gravity in secure enterprise and institutional communications and messaging. The company that came up with a secure communications system that had the confidence of the US Department of Defense was unable to build on that critical strength. Instead, RIM sat on its enterprise advantage in security and reliability and tried to compete in the consumer market against Apple and the numerous Android devices. RIM dissipated its limited resources on fighting against Apple and Android devices in the consumer market, when it should have been concentrating on strengthening its efforts in the enterprise and institutional sectors.

Food for Thought
You have to decide on what can’t, or shouldn’t, be done. This will free up resources to focus the main effort on leveraging the business’s centre of gravity, with secondary and supporting roles to explore at the margins, scout out new opportunities and threats, and protect the company’s main advantages.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Apple just launched it’s iPhone 5S and 5C. If ever we needed an example of how moral — i.e., psychological — factors can outweigh physical, material factors in business, then this is it. I am a big fan of Apple products. I have an iPhone, Macbook Pro, and iPad. However, even as a fan I have to admit that I was surprised by the effect that the iPhone 5S has had, with long lineups to get one. The high-end models appear to be outselling the low-end models by a large margin. This just goes to show that psychologically, Apple and its products are miles ahead of competing products. Even though the latter are roughly speaking equivalent in functionality and appearance, consumers still have an emotional attachment to Apple’s products. The media speculation ahead of the launch of the two new iPhones and the public enthusiasm for them demonstrate conclusively that curiosity and emotion drive people to commit to a company’s products and services beyond just the technical and functional characteristics. As with military strategy and tactics, psychological factors are a huge force multiplier.

Food for Thought
Have you created an emotional attachment with your customers, employees, suppliers, distributors, and managers?

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Here is an extract from my first teleconference in my 2013-14 Teleconference Series on How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. You get more info here and register for all ten teleconferences. The cost is only $150.00 for all ten. That will amount to 9-10 hours of audio. I provide a MP3 download within 48 hours of the call so you can listen as many times as you want at your leisure.

Listen to a sample extract:

The full teleconference last approximately 55 minutes and is available for purchase at $20.00 Cdn. Just contact me at info@alcera.ca.

It’s not too late to register for all 10 teleconferences. The teleconferences will start at noon eastern on the 3rd Friday of the next ten months, and run until June 2014. Each of the calls covers a different aspect of how to apply military wisdom to win your business battles, and is based on a chapter in my book, Brilliant Manoeuvres : How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. I’m adding new material and content so these aren’t just a repeat of the book.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes permitted with full and proper attribution.