Posts Tagged ‘morale’

Brilliant Manoeuvre
Morale is critical, but we must also acknowledge and understand all of the components that go into forging an effective organization.

Discussion
The subject of morale often comes up in my work with clients. Unfortunately, there is a very superficial understanding of the concept. As I’ve said before, morale is the willingness to fight and persevere, to make sacrifices to achieve victory or one’s corporate aims. People often confuse morale with other the other main components of organizational dynamics, such as mood, cohesion, and unity of purpose. They all go together, but are all different in focus and purpose. When we add the effects of leadership, we can get a much fuller picture of how to build an effective organization that can perform beyond expectations.

Questions
You can assess the morale in your organization through the following questions:

  • Do people have hope of better days or constant improvement? Are they optimistic or pessimistic?
  • Are your people making plans with themselves in the picture, or are they trying to abandon ship?
  • Do they waste a lot of time or do they focus on ways to continually improve the organization and its performance?

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
No one can predict the future, much to the chagrin of many economists and financial theorists and their media acolytes, who prefer assumptions of perfect knowledge and decision-making in all circumstances.

Discussion
I’m breaking my deliberate policy of not commenting on political issues this week in order to comment on reactions to the Boston Marathon bombings last Monday. My personal opinion is that the response of government and law enforcement agencies at all levels has been brilliant in the circumstances. However, there are already Monday Morning Quarterbacks saying that the government overreacted by shuttingn down Boston on Friday and part of Saturday. The problem is that the ones responsible for making these decisions can only plan and act based on information available at the time and the factors they felt they needed to consider. Just throwing out there that they overreacted without knowing those things is pure speculation based on specious counterfactuals or a personal hobby horse. If there is something I learned from a 26-year military career and my study of military strategy and history, it is that decisions that can look sub-optimal in hindsight may have been the best at the time given the circumstances of friction, uncertainty, and the fog of war. In this particular case, only a full after-action review will permit the systemic learning to occur. Saying it was an overreaction is nothing but pure hindsight bias.

Tip
The more complex and risky the undertaking, the more likely that friction will wreak havoc. We must compensate by building robustness, resiliency and redundancy into our plans and systems.

From the Vault
A Superb Example of Crisis Leadership in Action

By the way…
My ideas were featured in the March 25th Globe and Mail: A military approach to business.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

The more I work to bring military wisdom to businesses and executives, the more I see the power of mission analysis in action. In fact, I find this so important, that this month’s newsletter is adapted from my book, Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. I want to offer this powerful tool of motivation and alignment so as many people as possible can benefit.

In standard military terms, a mission is a clear, concise statement of the task of the unit and its purpose. The interesting thing though is that the mission doesn’t come directly from the superior commander’s orders, but rather as the result of a process of analysis by the subordinate commander. The easiest way to apply mission analysis in business is to answer the following questions.

  1. What are the vision, mission, and intent of the whole organization?
  2. What are my immediate superior’s vision, mission, intent, and concept of operations for our part of the organization?
  3. What explicit tasks, roles, and functions within the greater concept of operations has my immediate superior given me?
  4. Are there implied tasks that are required to support these assigned tasks?
  5. What are the limitations on my freedom of action? In other words, are there constraints (musts) and restraints (must not’s) I must follow?
  6. What can I observe, infer, and assume from the foregoing?
  7. What is the most concise statement of my mission?
  8. How has the situation evolved since the last time I answered these questions? Has it changed, or is it similar to the previous round of analysis?

From these questions, anybody can formulate a mission that fits into the bigger picture of the organization they are part of. In other words, you can’t formulate your mission statement and make your own plan of action, statement of intent and end state, without first determining how you fit into the puzzle.

To illustrate the application of mission analysis to business, let’s imagine that you are a sales manager with a small manufacturer of custom packaging for cosmetics and generic pharmaceuticals. The packaging is similar for both types of products as are the suppliers, production, and warehousing. The sales and distribution channels are completely different as are the nature of the buyers, marketing, merchandising, and promotion. The CEO, also the company’s majority shareholder, wants to double the company’s size within four years, expanding the customer base to all of North America from its current concentration in eastern Canada and New England. The vision is to become a leading producer of quality packaging for the entire pharmaceuticals and cosmetics industries in all of North America. The new strategy entails an expansion from generic pharmaceuticals manufacturers to all pharmaceuticals companies, particularly those providing over-the-counter drugs because it’s felt that the packaging is similar to that of cosmetics. There are also many similarities in distribution and merchandising. The company’s mission, therefore, is to provide integrated, quality packaging solutions at reasonable cost for the pharmaceuticals and cosmetics manufacturers in all of North America. It will do this by providing a complete packaging solution. All the pharmaceutical or cosmetic manufacturer need do is ship the product to the company’s facilities and it will do the rest, including sourcing inputs, designing the packaging and instructions, doing the packing and warehousing, shipping to distributors, etc. In other words, they are aiming to provide an end-to-end solution for manufacturers of generic pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.

The senior team has developed a strategy based on three major business thrusts: grow the pharmaceuticals business; grow the cosmetics business; grow the capabilities to provide end-to-end packaging solutions to these customer groups. The company has traditionally had only one sales team, but with the new strategy, the CEO decided to split the company into three groups to focus on each thrust. There is therefore a VP for each of Pharmaceuticals, Cosmetics, and Operations, and each has been given wide freedom of action to execute the strategy within his or her area. You are now part of the pharmaceuticals group, responsible for developing the over-the-counter drug segment. VP Pharmaceuticals’ intent and concept are shown in the table below, as is your mission analysis.

1.    CEO’s vision and intent
Vision: Become a leading producer of high quality packaging for pharmaceuticals and cosmetics manufacturers in all of North America
Objective: Double size within four years and expand customer base to all of North America from current concentration in Eastern Canada and New England.
Mission: Provide integrated high quality packaging solutions at reasonable cost for both markets.
Concept: Provide an end-to-end solution for manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Separate sales groups with one production and operations group servicing sales in both markets. Use mass customization approach for tailored customer solutions while optimizing efficiencies and economies of scale.

2.    VP Pharma’s intent and concept of operations
Vision: Preferred supplier of integrated packaging solutions for all major pharma manufacturers in North America wanting high quality packaging.
Objectives: Maintain generic pharma clients; reach all OTC drugs manufacturers as customers within 2 years; reach all other pharma manufacturers within 4 years.
Mission/Intent: Provide integrated packaging solutions so the pharma manufacturers can focus on developing and marketing their products, and not worry about packaging logistics.
Concept: Three sales teams focusing on three distinct client groups; generic sales team to expand to North America; create OTC sales team and build on existing client relationships in current clients to offer OTC packaging solutions, then extend to other companies; expand from OTC clients into other areas of pharma manufacturers and build sales team for proprietary pharma manufacturers as required.

3.    Assigned tasks
Develop the OTC manufacturers clientele.

4.    Implied tasks
Build a sales team; leverage existing relationships in generic pharma companies that also have OTC products; lay the groundwork to extend the same model to pharma companies that focus on proprietary drugs.

5.    Limitations
Must reach all OTC manufacturers within 2 years and all other pharma companies with OTC products within 4 years. Can go faster as opportunities arise.

6.    Observations, inferences, and assumptions
I infer from the foregoing analysis that the OTC sales effort is the critical one for the company, because it provides the bridge from existing relationships in current generic drug manufacturers to all other pharma companies. While OTC clients will be a major revenue source in and of themselves, the companies with proprietary pharmaceuticals form the bulk of the sector and that is where our company’s major future growth will come from. I therefore assume that the OTC sales team will be a priority for growth and resourcing over the next 2 years.

7.    Mission statement
Our mission is to expand existing client relationships in generic pharma to OTC drugs with a view to transferring this expertise to the proprietary pharmaceuticals manufacturers, first through OTC products, and then in support of all their other pharmaceutical products.

8.    Has the situation changed?
As the situation evolves in the next few years, you sit down with your team on a regular basis, or as needed, and redo this mission analysis to confirm that you’re still on the right track.

This notional illustration of mission analysis leads to a few critical observations. The first is that mission analysis is a dynamic process. Whether it is at the corporate, divisional, or team levels, the situation must be constantly assessed to determine whether the mission and goals are still relevant and, more importantly, still within the bounds of the superior manager’s intent and concept of operations. The second point is that the mission statement for any particular executive and sub-organization tends to flow of necessity from the analysis. Once the first five steps of the process have been done, the mission statement tends to be obvious. The final and most important point is that mission analysis is the glue that holds the whole framework of nested hierarchical planning together. Mission analysis enables managers and employees at all levels of the organization, no matter what their role or tasks, to fit into the big picture and know their mission. This empowers everyone to exercise initiative to achieve the vision and mission of the organization.

© Alcera Consulting Inc. 2013. We encourage the sharing of this information and forwarding of this email with attribution. All other rights reserved.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/management/a-military-approach-to-business/article10197913/

Brilliant Manoeuvre
Explain your plans and intent to your followers, as well as those of your immediate and higher superiors, and even the organization as a whole. Involve them in the planning and determination of your objectives. Get them to understand the criticality of their contributions and what they need to do to achieve the mission and vision.

Example
Bert Hoffmeister is recognized by historians as one of the most effective senior Canadian officers of the Second World War. He rose from the rank of Major and the job of company commander all the way to Major General and division commander in a few short years. He commanded during the very difficult and costly Italian Campaign, as part of Montgomery’s 8th Army. Whereas most Canadian generals tended to be aloof and overly analytical in their approach to command, Hoffmeister was able to communicate directly and on a gut level with soldiers of all ranks. He would involve his subordinate officers in the estimations and planning for operations and encouraged them to do so with their own subordinates. He would command from the front and keep everyone in the loop, usually by direct face-to-face contact. He was a master of motivation; his officers and NCOs would often do extraordinary things because they knew what was happening, why it was happening, and what their role was in implementing the plan and achieving the mission. Even more important, though, was that they had had a key role in the planning, so it wasn’t just something imposed from on high, but a mission that had grown organically with their input.

Tip
Keep your followers informed of the mission, the changing situation, and the overall picture.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
Complaining isn’t necessarily a sign of bad morale. In fact, the opposite is quite often true. If people stop talk, that’s when you should be worried.

Example
Morale is the willingness to fight, to persevere, and to make the sacrifices necessary to achieve victory. When morale is good, people care enough to complain because they know that things can be better, and that there is a better way to achieve the aim. When I was in the Army, I knew that things were amiss when my subordinates got too quiet. This was a sure sign to me that it was time to get them together so we could talk things out. Sometimes, I would stand my ground while explaining my decisions and plans. At least then my people had felt heard and understood my reasoning. They could then better appreciate the decision and apply it as if it were their own. Often, however, it was an opportunity for me to find out what had gone wrong or where I had been mistaken. I could then adjust my decisions and plans to take the suggestions (and complaints) into account if they made sense. The same applies in business, if you are hearing complaints from your people, or hear about them indirectly, it may be time to sit down with them to find out what is happening. You may be surprised at what you’ll learn.

Tip
Set aside regular time, at least once or twice a month, to meet with all your direct reports to hear from them. Ask them what they understand about the situation you’re in. Tell them what your understanding of the situation is and what you plan to do about it. Use this time to garner their input and to make suggestions for improvements. In the Army this tradition is known as ‘platoon commander’s hour,’ but you can also institute your own ‘CEO’s hour’ or ‘manager’s hour.’

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Richard gave a speech on 31 October 2012 at Rotman School of Management (University of Toronto) on How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. The speech was based on Richard’s book, Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles. In the speech, Richard gives his most detailed explanation yet of the timeless military principle of “following the path of least resistance” and how that applies in competitive strategy, motivation and influence, and organizational leadership.

View the video of the entire speech here.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
True motivation and discipline come from within. Individuals perform at the their best when they are impelled to do so from within. External rewards and punishments only go so far in influencing behaviour.

Example
When I was in the military I noted that perks and improvements in creature comforts tended to become seen as acquired rights rather than what they were intended as: rewards for a job well done. In the early 2000s, the Canadian military went through a number of significant pay and benefit increases. However, it would never take more than a few short months before we would start to forget the improved benefits. In early 2003 I was on a deployment to a camp in the Persian Gulf that had the best creature comforts and amenities that I had ever experienced on a military operation. It also had the worst morale and mood I’ve ever encountered in my 26 years in the Army. The lesson is that strong extrinsic motivators do not guarantee that you’ll have strong morale and a sense of purpose to bind and unify troops into a higher calling.

Tip
Strong morale is built upon unity of purpose and action, determination to succeed, and cohesion in the face of opposition, disruptions, uncertainty, friction, and obstacles.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

When I was on basic officer training in the Army our instructors would take us on ‘forced marches.’ Sometimes these were in the middle of the night while we were on exercise. Most times, however, this was the favoured way to get to the ranges for a day of marksmanship training. At the end of the day, when we were tired and anxious to get back to clean our rifles and take a nice hot shower, we would have to force march back to the barracks.

I remember finding it ironic that we would march very fast in formation, with all our battle gear on, and then stop for ten minutes every hour in order to rest. What’s the point, I thought, why not just slow down the pace and not take a rest? The idea of a forced march is that you cover a certain distance in a specific amount of time, and do it as a cohesive body of troops. As our instructors said, there’s no point in getting to the objective if we’re alone when we get there.

As I gained in experience as an infantry officer, I realized that there is wisdom in adhering to a demanding schedule—of marching, resting, or whatever else needs to be done. Despite fatigue and other factors, a military unit must be able to cover ground quickly and efficiently, and this makes for predictable results. However, I also learned that it is the easiest and most reliable way to motivate troops to cover the distance quickly. They know they will have to march fast, but they also get a rest every hour. They also know that by getting to their destination as fast as possible that they will be able to get to other important things.

In their book Great by Choice, Jim Collins and Morten Hansen discuss how companies that are consistent about regular and disciplined progress also show the best results over long periods. They call this the ’20-Mile March,’ and they argue it is most effective in chaotic and unpredictable circumstances. Even though the going is tough, a company commits to making small but measurable progress every day, month, and year. The company’s leaders also commit to not overdoing it when the going gets better. That way, they avoid overextending themselves when they are enthusiastic and optimistic, but they also continue to chug along when circumstances get harder and they are prone to a more pessimistic outlook. Collins and Hansen’s ’20-Mile March’ reflects the same philosophy that underlies military forced marching. You commit to predictable and demanding progress, with regular rest periods, and you do it consistently, whether conditions are good or bad.

A product-focused company must be consistent and disciplined about new product development, no matter what the circumstances. A sales team must be consistent about achieving specific objectives for sales activities with proven results, for instance, contacting X number of leads per day, week, or month, following up regularly and quickly on leads, asking for referrals, etc. A manufacturing company must be consistent and disciplined about making small and lasting improvements to its processes, logistics, distribution, sourcing, etc. A warehousing operation must be focused relentlessly on safety and security to minimize workplace accidents and losses due to fire and theft. All companies must be consistent and disciplined about recruiting and developing people for leadership, role redundancy, and succession planning.

You get the idea. Whatever the business objective, you have to commit to a demanding schedule of critical functions or tasks you require that will get you there efficiently and consistently. You then need discipline to maintain that pace through thick and thin. When the going is good, you don’t overextend or overexert yourself, and when the going is rough, you don’t quit or let up. You force yourself to march 20 miles a day, with regular rest periods, whether the weather is great, there is no enemy in sight, and progress is easy, or during storms, darkness, and against enemy resistance. What is your forced march discipline?

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes permitted with full and proper attribution.

Last Thursday I spoke in front of a group of security and intelligence executives from government and the private sector gathered under the auspices of the National Capital Security Partners Forum, a chapter of the Canadian Security Partners Forum. Grant Lecky, founder and president of the CSPF, as well as Bonnie Butlin, the group’s executive director, invited me to speak, and it was an excellent opportunity to spread the message of my new book, Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles.

The focus of my presentation was on ‘mission command’ and how it should be applied in business and other organizational settings outside the military. This is the approach the military uses to ensure that all levels of leadership in a unit are fully appraised of the situation and know the superior commanders’ intent, missions, and plans. The essence of mission command is to leverage the initiative of everyone in the unit to achieve its mission and vision. The key is to tell people what they need to achieve and why they need to achieve it, and to let them figure out the best way to get results, while staying within certain parameters. (I have a video which explains this concept in greater depth.)

The discussion was lively and reinforced two key points for me. The first is that mission command as practised in the military and in the most adaptable and robust organizations is definitely the best way to gain full alignment to the organization’s mission, vision, and objectives. On the other hand—and this is the second key takeaway for me—an organization or business that wants to create a culture of empowerment under the auspices of military style mission command must develop the proper skills, competencies, and organizational processes and decision-making structures. That organization also requires incentives that reward initiative and that allow a certain level of prudent, calculated risk-taking.

Another issue we discussed is how mission command is also highly applicable in a matrix management and/or project management framework. In such a system, managers who are responsible for organizational initiatives and projects have the mandate to achieve their aims, but don’t necessarily have the hierarchical control of the people and resources to carry out their missions and achieve their aims. This requires a mindset where everyone has to understand the mission and vision of the business or organization, and be an excellent team player. If everyone knows what is needed and why it is needed, that makes it much easier for project managers and initiative leaders to get the cooperation and collaboration they need to get their mandates done.

Executives and managers at all levels must not only be excellent managers, but they must also be transformational leaders. This requires a level of commitment from the organization’s senior leadership to develop and select for these skill sets over the long term. You can have all the best intentions in the world, but if your ‘chain of command’ isn’t fully committed to mission command and the leadership it entails, then pronouncements of empowerment and bottom-up initiative are just that, empty words. Every one has to walk the walk, not just talk the talk.

© 2012 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes permitted with full and proper attribution.