Archive for the ‘Never Fight Fair’ Category

Brilliant Manoeuvre
Disable your opponent’s centre of gravity–his unique source of balance and strength–and do so quickly and with resolve when you have a window of opportunity.

Discussion
Whatever you make think of the overall political and strategic rationale, the US-led invasion of Iraq in early 2003 is a textbook case of attacking when the time is right even though you aren’t fully ‘ready.’ Coalition forces invaded Iraq with lightning speed and continually kept the Iraqi forces reeling. The offensive had so much momentum that there was barely time to assemble and process prisoners. American forces headed almost straight for Baghdad–the strategic objective–and didn’t waste time with sidefights and securing flanks. This is also exactly how the German invasion of France in 1940 played out. The Germans headed straight for the Channel coast in order to cut off the bulk of French mobile forces that had moved forward into Belgium where they expected the bulk of the German army to attack.

Tip
These historical military examples show that there are occasions when boldness and speed can more than make up for uncertainty, relative weakness, and lack of resources. They also demonstrate that you have to aim for the centre of gravity to disable it as quickly as possible. Whether you’re in sales, product development, procurement, etc., the best objective is to attack your opponent’s or your problem’s centre of gravity quickly and directly.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
No one can predict the future, much to the chagrin of many economists and financial theorists and their media acolytes, who prefer assumptions of perfect knowledge and decision-making in all circumstances.

Discussion
I’m breaking my deliberate policy of not commenting on political issues this week in order to comment on reactions to the Boston Marathon bombings last Monday. My personal opinion is that the response of government and law enforcement agencies at all levels has been brilliant in the circumstances. However, there are already Monday Morning Quarterbacks saying that the government overreacted by shuttingn down Boston on Friday and part of Saturday. The problem is that the ones responsible for making these decisions can only plan and act based on information available at the time and the factors they felt they needed to consider. Just throwing out there that they overreacted without knowing those things is pure speculation based on specious counterfactuals or a personal hobby horse. If there is something I learned from a 26-year military career and my study of military strategy and history, it is that decisions that can look sub-optimal in hindsight may have been the best at the time given the circumstances of friction, uncertainty, and the fog of war. In this particular case, only a full after-action review will permit the systemic learning to occur. Saying it was an overreaction is nothing but pure hindsight bias.

Tip
The more complex and risky the undertaking, the more likely that friction will wreak havoc. We must compensate by building robustness, resiliency and redundancy into our plans and systems.

From the Vault
A Superb Example of Crisis Leadership in Action

By the way…
My ideas were featured in the March 25th Globe and Mail: A military approach to business.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
Leaders must know when it’s time to lead from the front and when it’s time to let others take the reins.

Example
German general Erwin Rommel was one of the most effective and respected commanders of World War II. He was renowned for leading from the front and knowing when it was time to exercise his influence and authority at the decisive point of battle. During the crossing of the Meuse River in 1940, he was at the front and realized that a window of opportunity had opened. Without dithering, he took command of two additional regiments from neighbouring divisions (he was commanding the 7th Panzer Division) in order to secure the river crossing and press the advantage of the German forces on the western bank of the river. During his command of Afrika Korps in North Africa, he was often caught behind enemy lines because he was so far forward. He would also fly over the battlefield to reconnoitre in his Storch plane. Both of these were necessary to stay in touch with the fluid manoeuvring in the desert, but they also demonstrate the risks that must be weighed to be effective in leadership. Rommel was willing to take those calculated risks because he wanted to be at the point of decision and exercise his leadership in person. All great military commanders have demonstrated this talent throughout history. The same applies in business. You have to know when and where to exercise your leadership. Leading from the front is needed to set the example, the tone, and the pace of an operation or project. On the other hand, once things are fully underway in the right manner, it is time to pass the baton to a trusted subordinate to continue with the project so the leader can focus his or her efforts on another strategic initiative.

Tip
A leader must be an example of professional competence, good conduct, and probity to earn the full respect, loyalty, and confidence of the people under his or her responsibility.

By the way…
My ideas are featured in today’s Globe and Mail: A military approach to business.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

As I’ve pointed out in my book, Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles, “To win in war and business requires seizing and maintaining the initiative; going on the defensive only buys time to withdraw, reorient or reconstitute one’s forces.”

In other words, successful business strategy is fundamentally about finding ways to go and stay on the offensive. The principles of offensive action are as follows: seize and maintain the initiative; manoeuvre for advantage; use the indirect approach; and probe and follow the path of least resistance.

I go into these principles in great detail in Brilliant Manoeuvres, but I’ve found that it is also necessary to understand one’s posture before trying to make any changes. This is why I’m currently developing a tool to assess offensive posture. Email if you would like to receive a copy of this document, which also includes examples of how it can be applied in competitive analyses.

As already mentioned, offensive posture is fundamentally about seizing and maintaining the initiative. This plays out in five different dimensions. When you combine all five, you get a highly revealing picture of your own competitive posture and that of key competitors, and that enables you to generate insights so you can ‘seize and maintain the initiative.’ For each of these dimensions, you can be the leader (or one of the leaders), ahead of the pack, in the middle of the pack, a follower, or far behind (or even dead last). Obviously, the terrain you want to occupy is leadership, or at least ahead of the main pack. Let’s look at these dimensions in greater detail.

Customers. If you’re the leader, you get to pick and choose your customers. This confers great flexibility as you can select product-market segments that are the most profitable, with the greatest growth potential, and also that contribute the most to a strong brand. Conversely, if you’re far behind the pack, you basically have to take what you can get in terms of customers. This usually forces you into a commoditized position, where you absolutely have no choice but to compete with ‘me too’ products at the lowest possible prices.

Price Flexibility. The key word here is ‘flexibility.’ It’s not necessarily that you always command the highest prices for your products and services, but rather that they be appropriate to your product-market mix and branding. If you’re the leader with all the initiative and freedom of action, you get to set your price. This could be the highest price possible, especially if you’re introducing new products and services aimed at early adopters. But it could also be at lower price points once you’ve created or penetrated a new market. Conversely, followers have little choice in setting prices. They basically have to follow what the market determines, and are often selling to the bulk commodity market and late adopters. Followers have no choice but to be imitators and low-cost producers.

Product Leadership. This factor follows naturally from the previous two. If you’re in a leadership position or ahead of the pack, you can be more innovative in creating differentiated products and services. You can also take more calculated and prudent risks. This is because you have more resources, such as capital and time, to experiment with initiatives. This confers greater freedom of action to manoeuvre around competitors but also to stay ahead of the pack. Conversely, followers are forced into commodification of their products and services, and by extension these have to be lower priced. This can be a conscious choice by a company, but it is also riskier because the leaders clearly have the initiative and freedom of action.

Brand Strength. Leaders tend to have strong brands that are recognized and admired. One of the principal benefits of brand strength is customer loyalty, even in the face of difficulties. Look at how customers have forgiven Apple for its mistakes over the years. At the other end of the spectrum, followers are non-entities in customers’ minds. They are generic and are often forced to produce generic products and services under license for stronger brands. This can be a conscious strategy, but once again it has considerably more risks, as the company has little room for error.

Surprise/Speed. This is perhaps one of the most unrecognized benefits of an offensive posture. When you have the initiative, you can pick and choose the time and place to act, how, when, and to whom you offer new products and services. Companies in the lead are often a lot quicker to respond to competitive challenges and changes in customer tastes. This confers surprise and magnifies the positive effects of the four other dimensions. On the other hand, followers are constantly being surprised or overtaken by competitors. A sure sign of a follower position on this dimension is when a company is constantly in crisis mode. Senior management has that ‘deer in the headlights’ look that comes from being surprised and unable to react in a timely and effective manner.

These five dimensions can be adapted to any situation beyond the competitive sphere, for instance in sales and marketing, organizational change initiatives, leadership, etc. A good start is to assess your offensive posture relative to your main competitors. Like I said above, feel free to contact me if you would like a graphical tool for doing so, or just to discuss your needs in this regard.

© Alcera Consulting Inc. 2013. We encourage the sharing of this information and forwarding of this email with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
If you can see something that appears self-evident, there’s a good chance that your enemy (or competitors) can also see it.

Example
Not long after my book, Brilliant Manoeuvres, came out, some of my friends and acquaintances who had also served in the military told me they had also been thinking about writing a similar book to mine. Another friend of mine has also been thinking of writing a book on a topic that is right in his ‘sweet spot’ as a consultant. The problem is that he’s been thinking about it for two years. In the meantime, someone else came out with a book that covers essentially the same ground. What both these literary examples have in common is that good ideas seldom come to only one person at any one time. Case in point, great scientific discoveries often occur to many people at essentially the same time. For instance, Darwin and Wallace discovered natural selection at the same time, but it was Darwin that published a full-length argument in favour of it. Consequently, he’s the one that history recognizes. The lesson here is that if you see an opportunity to introduce a new product, service, or set of ideas, then move quickly. Chances are that your competitors alos see the opportunity and are fixing to move. This requires speed, resolve, and agility.

Tip
Don’t wait for perfection to move. Do so when you’re approximately ready. As my mentor Alan Weiss says, “Move when you’re 80% ready. The last 20% is not worth the time or effort because you’ll have to change it anyway.”

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
Businesses must be constantly on the lookout for threats from all quarters, even those that appear highly improbable or even impossible.

Example
Wikipedia and Google Scholar have made Encyclopedia Britannica and Microsoft Encarta pretty much obsolete. Google, Ebay, Craig’s List and other forms of online targeted advertising have eaten into the traditional revenue sources of Yellow Pages and local newspapers. Now we’re seeing universities offering free online courses through the web, in some cases for some type of academic credit. The UK’s Open University, Harvard, Stanford, and many others are entering the fray. For instance, the latter offers a whole series of lectures on cutting edge physics by Leonard Susskind, one of the originators of String Theory! The Learning Company offers excellent university level lectures on dozens of topics at very reasonable prices through its Great Courses series. How long will it be before the traditional university, college, and even high school are overtaken by these threats that are seemingly “coming out of nowhere” and undermining their traditional revenue sources? Can these institutions react quickly enough to remain relevant in the coming decade?

Tip
Are you able to detect threats from any direction? These could be suppliers moving downstream, customers or distributors moving upstream, new technologies or products as substitutes, or completely new competitors entering your sector with innovative products and business models.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2013 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
The military uses the principle of combined arms cooperation to balance the strengths and weaknesses of various arms and elements within a force. This creates synergy and mutual support. A well balanced combined arms force is more adaptable, resilient, and robust, and is also in a better position to create dilemmas for the enemy, forcing him to commit forces in a manner that creates vulnerabilities.

Example
The perfect military example is how a combined arms battle group is organized. There is a balance of tanks, infantry, artillery, antitank, and engineer elements, supported by a mix of logistical and administrative elements. There can also be aviation and other force multipliers. For instance, the tanks provide speed, armour protection, and firepower; they provide the cover and close in fire support to the infantry so they can do their job to close with and destroy the enemy. Conversely, the infantry can protect the tanks from enemy infantry, occupy ground, and fight hand-to-hand with the enemy. Other elements such as engineers provide mobility and additional protection, and the artillery provides powerful fire support. In a business, various elements should be combined to create a powerful synergistic effect. For instance, a supplier that has long lead times and larger lot sizes, but that costs less, can be given the task of supplying components that are needed no matter what the demand is. On the other hand, a supplier that has shorter lead time for orders and needs much smaller order sizes — but that has higher costs — can be given the task of providing top up support to meet unexpected demand or to accomodate short-term design changes.

Tip
Find the strengths, weaknesses, talents, and skills of your key people. Group them into teams and assign them responsibilities in accordance with the combined arms principle. In other words, seek to create diverse teams that have a balance of strengths, talents and skills, and that compensate mutually for weaknesses.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2012 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

I will be speaking about How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles over the coming weeks. These speeches are based on my new book, Brilliant Manoeuvres: How to Use Military Wisdom to Win Business Battles (http://www.amazon.com/Brilliant-Manoeuvres-Military-Business-Battles/dp/1906403856/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1353335270&sr=8-1&keywords=brilliant+manoeuvres).

Here are the events:

  • 3 December – Queen’s University School of Business
  • 5 December – RBC Global Asset Management lunchtime conference, Hilton Lac Leamy, Gatineau, Quebec (private function)
  • 6 December – Canadian Security Partners Forum Ottawa Chapter (private function)
  • 10 December – RBC Global Asset Management lunchtime conference, Montreal, Quebec (private function)

Please feel free to contact me about my speaking, training and facilitation services on my website: http://www.alcera.ca/en/speaking-facilitation.php.

 

Brilliant Manoeuvre
The essence of manoeuvre is the process of bringing to bear one’s strengths against the weaknesses of opponents. By extension, manoeuvre also requires the ability to avoid or coopt resistance and exploit the weaknesses or opportunities that appear on the path to the objective.

Example
The !Kung San (also known as the Bushmen) of the Kalahari Desert in southern Africa have a traditional hunting technique that leverages their particular strengths marvelously while exploiting their prey’s weaknesses. The San are known for their ability to jog for hours in the mid-day heat of the desert they inhabit. They work together to separate their prey from the herd and then run it to exhaustion as a group. When the animal is at the point when it can’t run anymore and escape from the hunting band, the hunters come in for the kill at point blank range. The San have learned how to leverage their particular strengths: endurance, persistance, and cooperation; they use these to exploit their prey’s weakness: the inability to continue running for long periods of time.

Tip
Explore your self or your organization relentlessly to discover its centre of gravity. This is the particular concatenation of talents, stengths, weaknesses, and interests which confer balance and resilience to your self and organization.

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2012 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.

Brilliant Manoeuvre
Top-down, nested hierarchical planning is critical for the full articulation of the organization’s mission and for translation into purposeful action.

Example
Every leader and team in a company must take the time to articulate what the company’s mission and vision imply for them. Through the process of mission analysis, they must identify their own objectives to support the organization’s vision, objectives, mission and plan, then determine their own unique mission and plan to fit into that greater whole. This process must be reproduced at every level of the organization so that the entire company is pulling in the same direction to achieve its vision and mission.

Tip
Tell people what they must achieve and why they must achieve it, then let them come up with the best means to achieve it (the how).

Richard Martin is a consultant, speaker, and executive coach. He brings his military and business leadership and management experience to bear for executives and organizations seeking to exploit change, maximize opportunity, and minimize risk.

© 2012 Richard Martin. Reproduction and quotes are permitted with proper attribution.